I am very new to using docker. I have been used to using dedicated VM’s and hosting the applications within the servers OS.

When hosting multiple applications/services that require the same port, is it best practice to spin up a whole new docker server or how should I go about the conflicts?

Ie. Hosting multiple web applications that utilize 443.

Thank you!

  • ScottA
    link
    English
    41
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Use a single reverse proxy on that one port… it can then route the requests to the various back ends.

    You probably want something that’s Docker-native like Traefik or Caddy.

    • @EliteCow@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      Thank you! I am using Caddy and was able to define a unique random port for the other containers and access this via reverse proxy!

      • @herrfrutti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        If the containers are all in the same network. You dont need to expose a port.

        Lets assume you create a docker network called reverse_proxy and add all your contaiers that you want to be accessed by the reverse proxy to that network (including caddy).

        Then you can address all containers through the hostname in you caddy file and the port would be the default configurated port from the container.

        So in the end you just expose the caddy container and nothing more.

        • @EliteCow@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          In addition to Caddy being apart of the reverse_proxy network. Would I also have to add it to the Bridge network so that I can utilize the machine IP that docker is hosted on for port forwarding 443?

          • @herrfrutti@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            511 months ago

            Caddy would have the bridge proxy network and the port 443 exposed.

            version: "3.7"
            
            networks:
              proxy-network:
                external: true
            # needs to be created manually bevor running (docker create network proxy-network)
            services:
              caddy:
                image: caddy
                container_name: caddy
                restart: unless-stopped
                ports:
                  - 80:80
                  - 443:443
                volumes:
                  - ./data:/data
                  - ./config:/config
                  - ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro
                networks:
                  - proxy-network
            

            Other services:

            version: "3.7"
            
            networks:
              proxy-network:
                external: true
            
            services:
              app:
                image: app
                container_name: app
                restart: unless-stopped
                volumes:
                  - ./app-data:/data
                networks:
                  - proxy-network
            

            Caddy can now talk to the app with the apps container_name.

            Caddyfile:

            homepage.domain.de {
                reverse_proxy app:80
            }
            

            So the reverse proxy network is an extra network only for containers that need to be exposed.

        • @d_k_bo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          That wouldn’t work if multiple containers use the same port (eg. 8000), right?

          Without a docker network, I can just map 8001:8000 and don’t have that issue.

          • @aguslr@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            Yes, it’d work just fine because each container listens on port 8000 of their own IP address, not the docker server’s IP address. Caddy/Traefik just redirects traffic to that port.