The Berkeley Property Owners Association’s fall mixer is called “Celebrating the End of the Eviction Moratorium.”


A group of Berkeley, California landlords will hold a fun social mixer over cocktails to celebrate their newfound ability to kick people out of their homes for nonpayment of rent, as first reported by Berkeleyside.

The Berkeley Property Owner Association lists a fall mixer on its website on Tuesday, September 12, 530 PM PST. “We will celebrate the end of the Eviction Moratorium and talk about what’s upcoming through the end of the year,” the invitation reads. The event advertises one free drink and “a lovely selection of appetizers,” and encourages attendees to “join us around the fire pits, under the heat lamps and stars, enjoying good food, drink, and friends.”

The venue will ironically be held at a space called “Freehouse”, according to its website. Attendees who want to join in can RSVP on their website for $20.

Berkeley’s eviction moratorium lasted from March 2020 to August 31, 2023, according to the city’s Rent Board, during which time tenants could not be legally removed from their homes for nonpayment of rent. Landlords could still evict tenants if they had “Good Cause” under city and state law, which includes health and safety violations. Landlords can still not collect back rent from March 2020 to April 2023 through an eviction lawsuit, according to the Rent Board.

Berkeleyside spoke to one landlord planning to attend the eviction moratorium party who was frustrated that they could not evict a tenant—except that they could evict the tenant, who was allegedly a danger to his roommates—but the landlord found the process of proving a health and safety violation too tedious and chose not to pursue it.

The Berkeley Property Owner Association is a landlord group that shares leadership with a lobbying group called the Berkeley Rental Housing Coalition which advocated against a law banning source of income discrimination against Section 8 tenants and other tenant protections.

The group insists on not being referred to as landlords, however, which they consider “slander.” According to the website, “We politely decline the label “landlord” with its pejorative connotations.” They also bravely denounce feudalism, an economic system which mostly ended 500 years ago, and say that the current system is quite fair to renters.

“Feudalism was an unfair system in which landlords owned and benefited, and tenant farmers worked and suffered. Our society is entirely different today, and the continued use of the legal term ‘landlord’ is slander against our members and all rental owners.” Instead, they prefer to be called “housing providers.”

While most cities’ eviction moratoria elapsed in 2021 and 2022, a handful of cities in California still barred evictions for non-payment into this year. Alameda County’s eviction moratorium expired in May, Oakland’s expired in July. San Francisco’s moratorium also elapsed at the end of August, but only covered tenants who lost income due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

In May, Berkeley’s City Council added $200,000 to the city’s Eviction Defense Funds, money which is paid directly to landlords to pay tenants’ rent arrears, but the city expected those funds to be tapped out by the end of June.


  • whitepawn@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then what you want is less rental inventory. Because this is how you get less rental inventory.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      What, you gonna tear down the apartment buildings? You know you can just sell people the deeds to their apartments. That’s already in practice, in places with a shitload less homeless people.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know you can just sell people the deeds to their apartments.

        Considering that Apartments are not deeded per unit. No you can’t. You’d have to convert the apartment to condominiums… Setup an HOA (which everyone hates right?) then get everyone to pay into it… etc… You’re not getting away with not paying.

        • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Was that supposed to be a gotcha? Maybe your landlord should have replaced the lead paint in your childhood home.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, that would literally be a gotcha. It’s legally not possible to do what you want to do. That’s a hell of a gotcha.

            • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What I’m describing already exists, making every other consideration moot. If something exists, it stops being impossible. Do you see how that works?

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Apartments are not deeded by unit. So no. It cannot simply be done.

                So you see how that works?

                • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Did you miss the part where I told you this already exists? Because it does. It doesn’t matter whether or not you think apartments are deeded by unit, because we’re talking about the real world. If you want to get your point across, do it with some brainpower instead of “I’m Dirty Dan” ad nauseam.

                  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Okay… Find me an apartment complex that’s deeded by unit. Since it’s all public record you can just freely link me that information here. Since you claim it exists… you can provide evidence of it existing!

                    I can show you thousands of complexes that aren’t deeded by unit… hell most aren’t even deeded by building. But by full complex, which can easily be acres of property with hundreds of units.

                    Here… I’ll put one foot forward in good faith. https://goo.gl/maps/z2uRv9G14dk1GtLo9 is an apartment complex that I’ve seen before in person. It’s comprised of 2 parcels according to the county. Parcel numbers 134-22-207 and 134-22-208 which you can validate on https://maps.mcassessor.maricopa.gov/

                    If you search those parcels… https://mcassessor.maricopa.gov/mcs/?q=134-22-208 and https://mcassessor.maricopa.gov/mcs/?q=134-22-207 you’ll see information for the total lot of land. Not for each unit.

                    Now… The reason I chose this property to look at is because JUST SOUTH (https://maps.mcassessor.maricopa.gov/?esearch=13422267A)… you’ll see “Circle Tree Condominiums” which ARE individually owned units and are NOT apartments. MCR: 231-32. Zoom in far enough and you’ll see that each unit has a distinct parcel number.

                    So… now that we’re talking “real world”… Please find at least a few examples of your situation. Since I can literally show you thousands showing that you’re wrong.