• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I’m not getting the issue with this one either. They’re renting out their house for $40 a night, which is nothing, if the people are willing to watch the dog. If I wanted to stay in that area for a month, that seems like an affordable way to do it as long as the dog sitting expectations aren’t excessive.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone else said, looking after people’s pets when they are on holiday is a job. They should pay you to do that, not you pay them.

      You can pay people to pop round a few times a day to feed and walk the dog and then clean up after them. I’d imagine that adding an overnight stay to look after them would be more expensive too.

      So they basically want you to pay them for the privilege of looking after their dog.

      • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you needed to stay in the area, and liked dogs, it’s a helluva deal.

        You pay them rent on the place that you wanted in the first place, they pay you for dogsitting, it evens out to lower rent.

        Obviously if you weren’t looking to rent a place, it would be a shit deal. But that’s not what this is about.

    • zipsglacier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My reading was that the base price is $40/night, and there’s a further discount for dogsitting. This sounds like an amazing deal.