Also, the defence argued that impaired persons operating vessels “propelled by muscle power” are somehow not morally culpable. Like, because, why?
Also, the defence argued that impaired persons operating vessels “propelled by muscle power” are somehow not morally culpable. Like, because, why?
Different countries, different precedent, but I think the Canadian case hinged on the vessel being powered. Even if it’s a paddle, it’s muscle powered.
I know there are different standards for barges under tow than for the tugs doing the towing. If the courts are extrapolating these rules to the smaller end, than a float might be okay. You’re just cast adrift, usually with alcohol.