kalkulat@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · edit-210 months agoIt’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for lifewww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down134file-text
arrow-up1119arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for lifewww.nature.comkalkulat@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · edit-210 months agomessage-square75fedilinkfile-text
Review of 2023 book: How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology Philip Ball. ISBN9781529095999
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoSo, shall we call it “inactive regions” then?
minus-squareemergencyfood@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 months ago‘Noncoding region’ seems to be the preferred term.
minus-squarestoneparchment@possumpat.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 months agoNo, because they are anything other than inactive
So, shall we call it “inactive regions” then?
‘Noncoding region’ seems to be the preferred term.
No, because they are anything other than inactive