Not enough space for a stroller, had to walk in the middle of the street to go around the SUV.

  • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    269
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not an SUV… But yeah it looks like they backed up ONTO the curb, that’s pretty rude…

        • coyootje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          82
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Speaking as a Dutch person, our infrastructure just isn’t made for cars this size. People basically need to enlarge their driveways to park something like this. So if you need to park a car like this it’s almost impossible. That would stop most people from getting one, except the type of person that does buy one…

            • Tankaus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              36
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I hate to say it, but that looks like a pretty small truck.

              Source: I’m Texan but don’t hold it against me.

              • blitzen@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                1 year ago

                Seems to be what those in most of the US would call a standard size pickup truck. Not “compact” like a Hilux/Tacoma, nor comically oversized like the oft-lifted 3/4 or full-ton trucks.

                • Eavolution@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hang on a sec a Hilux is considered a compact truck in America? That’s a big old car where I’m from…

                • flyingjake@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  God bless - nothing wrong with having the right tool for the job and not being frivolous. I too have an overly large truck but it’s a 3/4 ton (2500 HD) and almost 15 years old. I don’t drive it more than necessary but I own 20 acres and often enough I need to tow, haul or pull something that I couldn’t do without it. I’m going to keep this thing on the road until it dies or there’s an economically viable green alternative. But it’s crazy to think of the resources that go into a new one and I couldn’t justify it for a few mpg better, so I’m very happy to have a trustworthy mechanic 😁

                  And, while I really like the Rivian and the F150 lightening, they would be glorified very expensive toys and I’d still need to keep my big truck for the hard jobs, so they’ll wait till I win the lottery ¯(ツ)/¯

              • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Looks like a Ram 1500, so not a small small truck like a Tacoma or ranger. It’s a decent sized truck, just got the short box 5’-8”.

                • Jjcool27@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I still don’t understand what the point of a short box is. You can fit a decent amount of materials in it but why not just go for a full size box. Go figure.

              • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Saw another post on here about how ridiculously oversized the Ranger parked next to them was. Had to laugh as an American, can’t even imagine how some of the 3500 brodozers you see here would look on a European street

            • Dandroid@dandroid.app
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is in Texas. I have a pretty small car, and when I lived in California, I was constantly barely able to fit in parking spaces. In Texas, the parking spaces are huge to fit the trucks. It’s so nice.

            • hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes it is, to say it isn’t is just a lie, even if only one due to being under informed. To put it like this, talking about big rigs, 18 wheelers, or whatever you would like to call them, here in the US you mainly see “long nose” (American) styles, although yes you do still see “flat nose” or “cab over” designs, they are the European style, as the roads in Europe tend to be smaller than here in American, mainly due to some of those roads being much older than the USA is.

          • cephi@lemmy.bunbi.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They don’t fit on Northeastern American roads either. Why they get manufactured and purchased as often as they do is beyond me.

          • FReddit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m in the U.S., and this a problem here. Part of it is financial – auto makers found a market for morons who will finance a $50,000 truck they have no need for.

            And they drive like they are invincible. Last week I (Mazda3) almost got crushed by two of these road monstrosities. After taking evasive action to a avoid a head on collision, I got tailgated by another idiot who very nearly rear ended me.

            This is also a rural area with no street lights, and a lot of these trucks are designed with a second set of headlights that blind you.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I call them any one of the following:

        • Grotesque monstrosities

        • Pavement princesses

        • Four wheeled Freudian excuses

        US trucks are ridiculously oversized and typically never see any actual “truck” usage. They’re also insanely expensive and are often redneck status symbols. As an American, I’m sorry they have infested your continent.

        Source: I live in a yeehaw state where people own $70,000 trucks while living in a $7,000 hovel.

        • evatronic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like the more generic “All Hat”, as in “all hat, no cowboy” because it not only captures the vehicle, but the owner too.

            • KreekyBonez@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              both work, not sure if there’s a real historical significance to using one over the other.

              in my opinion, “all hat, no cattle” has stronger assonance, and flows better as a phrase. especially with a slight southern USA accent, it has a satisfying cadence

        • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We luckily rarely see them here. I saw one once (could have been a nissan? It was so big it was taller than me and I’m 6 foot…)… the owner had attempted to park it in a local car park, it took up two bays and still stuck out into the road. I felt sorry for them… just nowhere to put something like that… how the hell they managed to manoeuvre it in and out of the car park I have no idea…

      • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a pickup truck. And probably not used for anything a truck would be used for. They’re everywhere in America and just as annoying.

        I personally don’t see the point in having a vehicle this big unless it’s used for work (hauling materials and towing trailers) And 95% of the time, it’s not.

            • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Too late. All our car companies folded so dickheads here are starting to buy Rams. The smallest utes you can buy here are the Hilux/Triton/Ranger/BT50 which are all about the same size and much bigger then the ones we used to make.

              • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Welp, that’s really disappointing. Once upon a time I thought the Holden Ute was pretty cool looking, and I liked stuff like the El Camino (dunno if y’all had those in Aus, but iirc they were discontinued in the US in the 80s).

                I hate the weird “I wanna big car” thing in the US. I can understand wanting lots of footroom and feeling like you’re in a tiny room instead of a car, but you don’t need a massive pickup for that. If that’s what you really want, buy a surplus humvee and take it somewhere to get a custom interior, new shocks fitted and maintenance done. It’ll probably be more interior space than you’ll know what to do with for half the cost of a brand new Ford, and it’ll probably do off-road better as well. Bonus points if you replace the engine with a modern, more efficient diesel or do a full electric conversion. Imagine how much torque you could get out of an electric motor hooked up to a decent gearbox on that frame.

                • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Holden is completely gone. GM pulled out of the RHD market entirely, so no more Holden, Vauxhall, or whatever they sold in Japan, SA, etc.

          • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You and me both. I had a 97 Dodge Dakota Sport, which is barely bigger than my CUV. I miss that thing. I hauler a fridge in it once to help my friend out. Haven’t had a need to haul a fridge since, but still, never know when a truck bed will come in handy lol. I just hate that the smallest size now is enormous. Even “sport” models are what used to be standard size anymore.

            • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sport/compact trucks these days seem like they’re really the same size, just with rounded off styling so you get less useful space

            • DokPsy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The way I’d see them coming back is if we improved on electric vehicle design to make it efficient for the size without losing safety or affordability especially long term.

          • nocturne213@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I have a 2015 Tacoma, which I love. But I would much rather an ‘84 Toyota pickup.

            • DokPsy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My deep dream is a revival of the El Camino but with current or next gen electric motors. Small with a bed for hauling larger items without the issue of fuel efficiency

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yup. If it’s got a bed in the back for transporting stuff, it’s a truck. In this case, a short-box truck.

        An SUV is basically like a tall 4-door sedan with hinged doors a hatch-back (if the rear doors are sliding, then it’s a van/mini-van)

          • phx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorta.

            The Chevrolet El Camino was a car-based light truck that Chevrolet offered from 1959–'60 and 1964–1987

            It was also a train, according to Wikipedia :-)

            • scottywh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol… I had to ask my gen z kid if he knew what they were… He didn’t so I showed him… Then I asked him, “car or truck”… He says car so that’s the answer from the future of America… 😂

              • phx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                LoL. Still to be fair from the front they very much look like a car and the chassis is probably more car than truck. It’s one of those weird in-between things but I suppose it is still better at carrying a load of whatever than a standard sedan.

      • theluckyone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As the owner of a Subaru Baja, I call it an Ute. The short bed is useful to a point (hauling tanks of flammable fuel, etc) but not perfect.

        If it’s not a body on frame vehicle, I wouldn’t call it a truck.

        • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ute is also body on frame (in aus at least) but I would still call the oversized emotional support vehicles trucks instead of utes. That being said, most single cab utes have a bigger bed than a truck like an f150.

    • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean the truck bed is like 3 feet long, you can’t do anything with it, it’s never been off-road, and it has two full size rows of seats. It’s an SUV in denial.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    See, my crippled ass is going to squeeze through anyway. Even if that means the metal clasps on my shoulder bag grind against the vehicle, or even if the attachment point for the strap on my cane happens to dig in if I happen to stumble because of the tight space.

    Will that result in dents and scrapes? Absolutely. Do I care? Absolutely not.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      My non-crippled ass would possibly also have some issues. I might trip with my keys in my hand or something worse. Who’s to know what dangers parking like this could pose.

      • neumast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Care about how this a-hole blocks the sidewalk? Yes!

        Care about accidential scratches or dents when walking around that pickup? No!

  • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t tried it yet, but I’ve heard that you can call to get vehicles towed if they are blocking the sidewalk. I don’t know if that’s in every municipality, but I suspect the tow companies and the city would not mind the revenue.

  • Aer@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    So much of that in England. I get people don’t want to block the road, but when you are sitting on the entire footpath so nobody can get passed. You’re an asshole.

    I was so cross when a van didn’t bother to park just a few metres away in a designated parking spot to go to the corner shop and just decided to sit and block the entire pavement at a point to close to a hedge that meant we were forced to go out into the road.

    Laziness. Just laziness.

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me just squeeze on by ya with this shopping cart lined with steel wool. Sorry, pedestrians aren’t allowed on the road!

  • unwinagainstable@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Blocking sidewalks anywhere is a shitty move. If you can’t park without blocking the sidewalk, you shouldn’t park there. This includes your own driveway

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might as well be a hatchback towing a box of dildos for all the times that tiny truck bed will be used for anything that looks like work.

      • infinite_zero@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As the owner of a Ford Maverick, with an even smaller bed, you’d be surprised how often I’ve used it to haul bulky things that wouldn’t fit in an enclosed SUV. It’s definitely capable of plenty of “work.”

        That being said, whomever did that parking job deserves all the keying they will be getting.

        • dnzm@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With those rims and tires, and in that location, I can assure you that thing isn’t for work.

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Buy a truck for truck things and a car for car things. When they try to do both like that, they do neither well. I keep a truck and a car. I wouldn’t buy a truck without a full size bed, otherwise it’s not a truck. I don’t know what that thing is, but it’s not a truck.

  • Xeon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While trucks are complete nonsense to have for 9/10 owners, sometimes it’s choosing between two evils. Either park it like this, or have it stick out this far at the front, blocking traffic flow.

    Instead of being infuriated by the way it’s parked, we should be just because it’s a truck that Is useless to have, especially in the Netherlands.

    • break1146@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Block the flow of traffic. Vehicle traffic has predefined rules to deal with this and it happens all the time. Now you’re forcing pedestrians to go onto the road creating a safety hazard. Strollers, like with OP, or disabled people or really you name it are severely disadvantaged by this, just because this person needed a gigantic car thought vehicle traffic was more important than pedestrians.

      • Xeon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying one is better than the other, all I’m saying is that both ways it sucks and trucks in general are just infuriating.

        • break1146@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m saying one is better than the other, significantly even. But yes, trucks in general are infuriating. They’re more dangerous for other road users in every single way. You can barely see people over the hood. Other road users are not crash compatible and they use up a lot of space and use a lot of fuel. There’s no reason for these to be around other than feeding people’s egos.

    • TommySalami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, the answer is “Your vehicle is too large to park here.” It’s one of the reasons I drive a smaller car, parking is a bitch where I’m from and I’d hate passing up spots because I can’t fit.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my country it’s actually illegal to do this. Law states that wherever you are parking you have to make sure there are 1.8m left for the pedestrians.