• TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Which is the same as a vote for a dictator. And that is super cool if you are looking forward to Project 2025, and selling out loved ones so they can be put in camps as political prisoners.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have you thought maybe the democrats themselves own some responsibility for the jeopardy the election is in? Maybe banning one of the most popular social media sites right before an election was a bad move?

        • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pretty sure that funding, aiding and abetting a genocide while denying there’s money for anything that benefits their own citizens is what’s losing the democrats support.

        • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          It had votes/support from both sides. And giving away democracy because you’re upset about a social media site seems like a bad take. Imagine telling future generations you traded the country’s democracy because you were mad at them because they took away your short video sites.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Can you not comprehend what i said? Tiktok is more popular with younger people, and younger people have historically voted more for democrats. Of course republicans would help democrats shoot themselves in the foot here. How can you see this and not give any responsibility to the democrats?

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        🤡

        Is a vote for Trump actually two votes for Trump? Oh! Is every dollar you don’t donate to Biden a dollar donated to Trump?

        • Christian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Mathematician here, I can answer this. Equivalence relations are symmetric, so if staying home is a vote for Trump then showing up to vote for Trump is the same as staying home on election day.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Okay, but then isn’t staying home also a vote for Biden by the same logic?

            This isn’t a binary relation, there’s clearly three options (vote for Biden, vote for Trump, vote for neither).

            • Christian@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              That doesn’t make any sense. The idea that staying home could be a vote for Biden seems pretty silly on its face. If that were true, there wouldn’t be any point in going out to vote for him, because the majority (or at least a plurality) of the country stays home regardless. He’d win in a landslide.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                Why is it that staying home is a vote for Trump but it isn’t a vote for Biden. Doesn’t that seem strange to you?

                And you’re right, it doesn’t make any sense, and that applies to staying home being a vote for Trump. The plurality of the country stays home, so Trump should win in a landslide, right? Yet he lost once. This seems like a glaring error in the idea that a protest vote is a vote for Trump.

                • Christian@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Doesn’t that seem strange to you?

                  It doesn’t seem strange at all. I have never once heard someone suggest that staying home is a vote for Biden, but it’s pretty well agreed upon that not voting is a vote for Trump.

                  …so Trump should win in a landslide, right? Yet he lost once. This seems like a glaring error in the idea that a protest vote is a vote for Trump.

                  Only if you believe that election wasn’t stolen.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I have never once heard someone suggest that staying home is a vote for Biden, but it’s pretty well agreed upon that not voting is a vote for Trump.

                    That’s the strange part! Why is staying home a vote for Trump but not a vote for Biden? What makes them different?

        • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not following your logic here. Not voting, or actually voting for Trump both work in his favor because his base is going to vote for him no matter what. You would only be hurting the side that wants us to continue to have future elections. But at the end of the day if you can look in the mirror and be ok with selling out democracy more power to ya.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            They just passed a fascist bipartisan bill to censor TikTok because it was showing the truth about Gaza and because it was disrupting the preexisting media cartel that already exists in the US. This was part of a larger fascist foreign aid package meant to help Israel carry out its genocide and prolong the war in Ukraine instead of seek a peace deal and help provoke a war in Taiwan by arming them to the teeth and pushing us to fucking WW3. By voting for them you are making it clear that they can do anything they want to you and you’ll beg for more.

            I already decided not to vote for genocide Joe a while ago. If I’m going to vote at all, I’m going to vote the way Bushnell did.

          • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            But at the end of the day if you can look in the mirror and be ok with selling out democracy more power to ya.

            Brotherman I want Amerika to collapse. You think I wouldn’t be able to look at myself in the mirror? I already can’t any day I feel like I’ve sold out to you settlers; selling you out to a better steward would probably be the most tacit sense of relief I’ve felt in my ENTIRE LIFE.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        No, it’s not.

        Abstaining from voting is an option the voter is given.

        I bet you have a heck of a time differentiating apples, oranges, and pears.

        “A pear is basically just an orange because you didn’t pick the apple.” - TimLovesTech

      • wildncrazyguy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The guy you replied to has replied in a similar variant of “x event happened, therefore dems don’t want to win.”

        Can’t fault them though, he’s just doing his job and following orders. The opposite would be …. Unthinkable