• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the same person that put a loaded firearm in the oven we both know there was a round in the chamber.

    And no, in my experience very few hand guns have the “limpwrist” issue.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the same person that put a loaded firearm in the oven we both know there was a round in the chamber.

      yeah, that’s probably fair.

      And no, in my experience very few hand guns have the “limpwrist” issue.

      hmm, either case, this guns is im assuming just sitting in there, so if it does fire a round, the force to rack the slide would have to be less than the required force to move the gun around. It’s possible it could do both, due to physics fuckery, but i’ve not exactly tested that one…

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I really want to test this, but the idea of inventing a more random version of Russian roulette where the gun is in a box and will shoot at random in a random direction you can not see…

        Damn it, I need to test this.

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Can I recommend digging a hole to test in. In addition to the typical hide behind a very solid wall not right next to it with some way to remotely pull the trigger. And one live round with the followup round being a dummy would also be a good bet.

          But there are so many variables to test here… If it works on a smooth surface then you gotta see if it works on a surface like an oven rack. Would have to check different models as well. We just really need some semiprofessional to test this thoroughly.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I would need to ether dig a whole and also have a bullet stopping roof on it or build a four berm range. I was thinking the better way to test it would be to hand load some rounds with the same powder load and bullet weight (needed to cycle the action) but with a bullet equivalent that is not capable of much penetration (like a fine lead powder).

            I think I would start with 2 rounds and the firearm fixed in place (to test if the action will cycle at all). Then go to oven with gun on baking sheet and 2 rounds. Then go oven rack and 2 rounds. And then maybe baking sheet and full mag if it all worked as theorized. I don’t think you need a way to pull the trigger since the firearm while heating is inherently in an unsafe condition, you would have to instead leave the thing to cool for a long time (also to rule out hang fires) and unload the rounds for inspection (not to be reused).

            • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh I was definitely just considering testing the firearm being able to cycle the action when sitting loose on a flat surface, lol. I wasn’t anticipating getting a fully functioning oven in the hole, that does complicate the matter considerably.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Oh if I tested this it would be full on danger oven. The most expensive part would be the ruined pistols (extra difficult in my country where we can no longer legally buy new ones)