Element is launching the world’s first communications platform based on the upcoming Matrix 2.0 release. The result is blazing performance which outperforms the mainstream alternatives - across a decentralised system that enables self-hosting and end-to-end encryption - as well as open standard interoperability to revolutionise real time communication between large organisations.

Built on Matrix 2.0, Element X now rivals the performance of centralised consumer messaging apps, empowering organisations to address the shadow IT issues caused by consumer-grade messaging apps in the workplace.

The new Element communications solution consists:

  • Element X, our next-gen app with an array of new features
  • Element Call fully integrated into Element X, for native Matrix-encrypted voice and video
  • Element Server Suite, our backend hosting solution for powerful admin control and Matrix 2.0 performance
  • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I had just uninstalled Element X like two weeks ago because I found it to under perform compared to the normal Element client on Android, in addition to lacking some features. I guess I’ll give it another shot.

    Update: WOW this thing feels lightning fast compared to just a few weeks ago. This is great. Not sure about feature completeness, but based on speed I think I’ll migrate Element > Element X again. Great job to the team!

  • azron@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    “invisible cryptography” I sure hope this isn’t an empty promise. The number one gripe I have with matrix/element is the absolutely horrendous crypto dance they make you do.

    • Rexios@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      What are you talking about? Even before this new “invisible cryptography” you set it up once per device and never have to think about it again.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s probably the number one reason I can’t convince friends to move over, I know they would bawk at how it makes them do that on every device

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        while I agree that there are too many problems right now, 2 things really can’t be avoided:

        • setting up key backup after registration asap
        • verifying your new logged in devices, possibly with the key backup password

        well, unless they are fine with using it like signal, which is basically one device only

            • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Not really, have used it for years like that. But you need to set it up initially on your phone. The newish feature (less than a year) is that I think they do not require a phone number to set up a new account.

              • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                The newish feature (less than a year) is that I think they do not require a phone number to set up a new account.

                How do you do that? A few days ago I have registered again, and I didn’t see the option. Didn’t you perhaps mean that the app can hide phone numbers?

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            (part 2) technically, though, the other part of it is still the case: if you haven’t set yo key backup and you lost your phone, don’t be surprised if you can’t recover all your messages

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I studied cryptography and I can’t figure out how to do the dance right. I thought I did, but one of my contacts says they can’t read any message I send them. And I can’t message them to figure out why.

        We haven’t spoken since. Thanks Matrix.

  • Scio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    Still no Spaces support. Even the short list of rooms I’ve joined are unmanageable when listed flat with no way to identify which Space a #general belongs to

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Native OIDC support…something I wish more self hosted apps would prioritize. I shouldn’t need to maintain a bunch of user account systems on my own servers.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Discord uses their own screen sharing implementation because it performs better than what’s available in Electron by default. I don’t expect Element to achieve that, considering their focus isn’t gaming.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Yes, you can. The server code is on github. But I don’t know why you would, since all messages are encrypted client-side.

          Its more secure because you know that all your users can’t send a message unencrypted, either accidentally or intentionally.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            there’s a graphical indicator if they send something unencrypted, and there’s no way to turn an encrypted chat into an unencrypted chat on matrix. Plus they start encrypted by default, I honestly don’t even know how to make an unencrypted chat, I don’t think there’s any good way to other than using a client that doesn’t have encryption.

            this is not a real problem.

            • delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              It is a problem. Many orgs have strict rules not to use messaging solutions that support unencrypted messages

              This doesn’t tick the box, so it blocks adoption

  • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    The result is blazing performance which outperforms the mainstream alternatives

    I highly doubt that. At last the last version of it (released earlier this year) that supported my previous phone I’m pretty sure was more sluggish than telegram.
    And even though it’s not really a visible problem on my new one, and even though that I can’t check it’s resource usage anymore (thanks again google for fucking uo /proc! it was a huge idea!), it still means that it uses more battery power

    • lemmus@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Telegram isn’t really an alternative, they don’t even use encryption by default, so it should be faster. Better to compare real alternatives: Signal, Whatsapp, Simplex etc.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Telegram isn’t really an alternative, they don’t even use encryption by default, so it should be faster

        even the user interface? the animations all over the app, scrolling between 2 consecutive messages of a room or anywhere in the settings? It’s not like element would encrypt the data at rest anyway. any and all menus of telegram are noticeably smoother, when not even looking for it

        • lemmus@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          When telegram team is mainly focusing on UX instead of privacy and security, it is not wierd for me. They don’t have to bother about encryption, about matrix protocol which federates all the self-hosted servers, about self-hosting in itself etc. I’m pretty sure element’s UX is a side-quest compared to all those other things under the curtain. Summing it up, Element X is in fact a huge upgrade, making it closer in UX to other mainstream apps like those i mentioned above, not Telegram, because it is not even a messenger, its just a social media app that immitates “private and secure” messenger, but in reality it is just twitter DM.

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        No but people use it because it’s pleasant and easy to use with a nice UI, lots of features for stickers and sharing content, etc…

        Having encryption and being ‘secure’ is not what will get most people to switch from Discord and Telegram, having the same features and doing it even better will.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Element X is a completely different beast though. Not only is it a successful Rust rewrite, but they also fixed the system architecture of Matrix to improve speeds. They haven’t matched Telegram’s usability though, but they’re close to Signal’s.

    • Untold1707@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Native Sliding Sync (AKA Simplified Sliding Sync) was just released to Synapse and Element X over the past couple of weeks. It’s not an exaggeration to say that it is FAST now. My fairly large account usually syncs instantly now. If not instant, the longest I’ve seen was 1 second. Give Element X a try again (assuming your home server supports SSS).

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    The last time I used element x was probably a couple months ago and I wouldn’t really call it ‘production ready’. But I guess I’ll have to try it again.

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Element x still doesn’t have support for spaces. Trying to navigate between rooms just by scrolling through one huge list is a nightmare.

    • tmpod@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I still don’t think it’s there, but development hss been fast, so a lot has changed and improved in the last couple of months.

  • Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’m still sad they stopped work on dendrite. P2P level decentralization, with E2EE, would be amazing.

    These are still great improvements though. I’m hyped that loading seems to be so much faster.

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’ve been using the nightly releases for element X android for some time.

      Sliding sync means messages are fetched quite a bit quicker, though it’s not yet feature complete relative to regular element android.

      I’ve not yet tested element call on EXA, however, but it’s worked very nicely for me via web.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    What’s the difference between the normal app and element X? Why create a new app?

    EDIT: I installed it, but can’t verify for some reason.

    EDIT: It works now, and it’s very fast compared to the other client. It’s a shame spaces aren’t supported.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I currently use Synapse with bridges to Signal and Discord, and Matrix API. Is Element X a better way to go server-side now?

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          No they don’t, it’s just confusingly worded

          Element X is a matrix client that will eventually replace Element for android/ios

          Matrix 2.0 is the server suite, some of the changes in matrix 2.0 are necessary for element x to work.

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            I think it’s actually Element X, Element Call and Element Server Suite, and they just did not want to write Element 3 times

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Got it, thank you. So if I’m following now, Matrix 2.0 a new protocol, and the solution to run instead of synapse is Element Server and Element Call?

              • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                Is that still the case?

                This level of integration means that group VoIP in Matrix finally benefits from all of Matrix’s native end-to-end encryption, cryptographic identity and decentralisation - no longer handing over to a third-party system such as Jitsi which doesn’t integrate with Matrix’s encryption guarantees.

                And, native E2EE for voice and video (through the Element Call integration mentioned above) ensures that Matrix’s encryption guarantees now extend to video conferencing.

                Though I’m assuming you mean protocols not app names.

        • kudos@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          No, that’s your reading comprehension. You are conflating Matrix 2.0 and Element X.