Thought it’s probably fine after reading the title, but this shit isn’t fine. What the fuck.

An app store for linux.

I tried taking the whole charging port out and going at it with a little brush, no improvement.

Try the toothpick or something stronger than a brush anyway. I have used a toothpick and a sewing needle to dig the compacted lint out.

deleted by creator

I know it’s dominant, but it just sucks. To go back to the previous analogy, Whatsapp should have a monopoly on communication as much as BMW should have a monopoly on transportation.

The main event here was pretty interesting, but I’d just like to say that

It asked me for my name and Whatsapp mobile number.

Why not just the mobile number. Do they also operate drive-ins that only accept BMWs?

Why would it be illegal, or unethical? I don’t really see any reason.

I mean, I haven’t seen a “Giga Train” before. Maybe it is the world’s first.

Can it be forwarded to a paid number?

Guess I should give it a proper look, then.

Unfortunately YT removed the ability to report spam comments recently. lol

Surely this isn’t true…? That would be so dumb.

It is actually useful?

In my experience it just looked like SEO farm that polluted my search results with irrelvant machine-generated content.

I think the name has been there longer than threads(.)net. But yeah, at this point it’s too easy to confuse if one doesn’t know about it already.

That’s a good jest

I’m guessing these are all just very recent.

I interpret it as the accused is the victim and the accuser is a grifter, but I’m still not sure about the full message.

In that case I have majorly misunderstood some things before. I think the phrase should be given a bit more thought, because it really sounds like it’s about believing all accusations.

It really sounds like she has decided the boss was making advances and is interpreting everything as a sign to reinforce that belief.

renaming a draft presentation file with his initials “AJG” in brackets as standing for “A Jumbo Genital”.

asked her when a project would be finished, she told the tribunal he burst out shouting with an “extremely angry voice”, saying “I need date, date, date”. Ms Gasparova interpreted this as having been asked “the exact date when I would finally agree on sexual contact with him”

To indicate what details he required her to fill in he used XX, YY and ??? in the message, written in red. ‌The tribunal heard she interpreted the Xs as meaning kisses, the Ys as sexual contact of some kind and the question marks as when she would be “ready to engage in sexual acts”'.

This reads like satire. Did this really happen or is something important left out? Surely no one can understand things this wrong?

Working as intended.