Removed by mod

Again, quoting the article, it says that many students (although maybe not most) will graduate without an understanding of these three subjects.

How can that be considered a positive, and what’s even more; acceptable?!

What the hell are you talking about!? It says in the article that these three subjects have been moved out of mandatory learning.

Meaning that most Indian students won’t understand the basic principles of evolution or the most simple understanding of the composition of elements.

Not considering either of these three to be essential mandatory learning is insane.

Both the left and right wing (except the most radical right) parties in Sweden propagated mass immigration which is now such an enormous burden to deal with.

He retweeted that ‘AI can be used as a disruptive force in politics’. Which is obviously true, but the one who made that original claim had ties to the news agency RT, and therein was the problem.

And that about covers the whole story, really. It’s not very interesting, really.

I never said anything about exactly what makes a good hunter. I was making a counterpoint to the quote of the article

Nowhere does it definitely state that’s the case. In fact, the data doesn’t even support that claim since women should excel at ultra marathons, but they don’t. In fact, women don’t excel in any running exercise that I can find.

Sure. But you then need to show the data that supports those points

I was asking the commenter to explain what a ‘better’ runner is supposed to mean? And tou perhaps was answering something else…

That may be, who knows (without supprting evidence)? But see, things is, I don’t think hearsay is what a good article in Scientific American should be based on.

What? I just looked at the records for ultramarathons, and there is not a single instance of women beating men for their respective runs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramarathon?wprov=sfla1

I just looked at the measured data and came to a conclusion. I don’t even know what conclusion you’re trying to communicate, but it beats me…

Ok, better how, you mean?

Mounting evidence from exercise science indicates that women are physiologically better suited than men to endurance efforts such as running marathons.

Looking at marathon athletic records; that’s not at all true and took me about 3 min to verify. In fact, out of all the top 25 record times, all are by men (and almost all Kenyan and Ethiopian men).

What is this tripe? They could at least try to be serious…

Removed by mod

As a one-party state governed by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, it was a flagship communist state.

In the summary of the article. 5 seconds this time. Still as waste of time if you can believe it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union?wprov=sfla1

That took me about 10 seconds

Some incredible fucking insight, especially as it goes against probably all historical literature we have on the subject.

And what’s is your source for all of this?

None of which any Communist state in history has achieved.

Wth are you talking about?

China isn’t Communist enough for you?