No you don’t understand, the “journalist” was supposed to write an accurate article about 2024, back in 2018. Is it real journalism if there’s no time travel or scrying powers involved?

Oh he’s changed since then? I guess 4 years is plenty of time for self improvement. Can you tell me what regime he followed?

Oh, nice. I can’t see that in the Boost app, but is plain to see on a web link. Thanks!

Which rule did that break?

Removed by mod

My point was that denazification was not the reason. So you agree with my only point and then extrapolated a bunch if other stuff.

Aha, but Azov is very powerful neo-nazi movement. They and their allies may hold no political seats, but the only way to be sure is full-scale invasion special military operation. Will only be few days weeks months years

I imagine they mean like Ottoman coffeehouse rather than Starbucks, but still true about the lack of whiteboards

Never thought he would refer to himself as the wedge, but it’s an image of a three-way I never wanted in my mind

I don’t want to think about it at all

He appears to be wearing a zombie president costume, so it’s a character piece

Neck seems optimistic

Sorry, next time I will look at all Ukrainian soldier social media accounts and then look up who Stepan Bandera is and worship him and I’m sure that will provide more context to the article you posted

You seem to be completely ignoring my analysis of the content and the source and the MPs background which I posted above. It seems like I’ve thought about it more than you.

That would be the “Source of the source”

Thanks for the additional context.

The additional context: “yes, I posted a propaganda article, but your investigation of the source and the source of the source wasn’t enough. You need to investigate more but I won’t provide any links or other sources.”

TIL its tOtALlY rANdOm to read the “About Us” page of a website that people are discussing the origin of.

Do you realise I’m a different person to the other poster? You told them to read the website and you are telling me not to read the website.

I already clicked through to the source, an RT article, which is clearly labelled as posted by the Russian part of BRICS.

I also looked up the MP, who was expelled from her liberal party for corrupt activities and now represents the party of an oligarch which has less than 1% of the national vote share.

So yes in conclusion, it is Russian propaganda. Who knows if the 100,000 figure is true, she is the only source, but without context it doesn’t really mean anything anyway.

Was I supposed to read all that or not?

What is BRICS? Very useful page, that…

You must not have seen Walz playing Crazy Taxi with AOC then! I reckon he has at least dipped a toe in Fortnite.