That one wasn’t reeeeeeeeally writing at random though.

Security is, and always has been, a matter of making your shit harder and take longer to break. Any security is penetrable, given enough time and willpower, just make sure it takes longer than it’s worth.

If there are an infinite number of trials (either infinite monkeys or infinite time), the outcome is truly random, and the desired text is finite, it must necessarily happen at some point. In fact, it’d happen an infinite number of times.

The original thought experiment clearly states infinite. As soon as you bound that in any way (such as not infinite monkeys, but 1 monkey for every atom in the universe) you’re talking about another experiment entirely. Infinite means infinite, not really really big. Gotta use some critical thinking 👍

Like pulling a tooth.

I work in tech support. I haven’t done this, but a user I’ve worked with absolutely has. I have a photo around here somewhere, if I recall correctly he actually ripped the wires out of the cable lmao!

Edit: the picture. Guess it wasn’t wires out of the cable hah.

Can I get some? Please?

My sarcastic asshole would have snapped the wheels off the bag if that’s the distinction they want to have.

Coins don’t usually offer a reason and explanation for the result. The valuable bit isn’t often just the answer itself, it’s the process used to arrive at them. That’s why I tell it to give me rationale.

I’ve used chatGPT for argument advice before. Not, like, weaponizing it “hahah robot says you’re wrong! Checkmate!” but more sanity testing, do these arguments make sense, etc.

I always try to strip identifying information from the stuff I input, so it HAS to pick a side. It gets it “right” (siding with the author/me) about half the time, it feels. Usually I’ll ask it to break down each sides argument individually, then choose one it agrees with and give a why.

Skill issue.

2 S’s for dessert - you always want a second helping. How I always remember that one :p

Functionally the same but inverted in the states, there are signs that tell you when it’s NOT allowed. Just a matter of which is more efficient, signing when it’s allowed or signing when it’s not.

Oh nice! I don’t wear any necklaces or similar jewelry, but I’ll keep that in mind.

I’d suggest the back of a closet door or similar!

This is essentially my idea as well. Hang em by the clasps. Even without permanently affixing something, a few quick-assembled rods with hooks, held in place with a suitable amount of command strips or similar no-damage hanger.

I’d rig up some kind of hanging solution. Hang them from the clasps in a row on like, the back of a closet door or something.

Take your fuckin upvote and go hahah

Cuffed would be more like detained. Not free to leave, because they’re actively investigating, but no charges are being presented. Literally just placed in cuffs while the police do their snooping.

I feel like when you’re talking corporations, hanlons razor needs to be reversed. Never attribute to stupidity what could be adequately explained by malice. We’ll call it Nolnahs razor.

Nice alt account bro