What are your thoughts on the alternative path the article talks about “…zeroconf, mDNS, or DNS-SD advertisements”?
No one compares You stand alone To every record I own Music to my heart That’s what you are A song that goes on and on
What are your thoughts on the alternative path the article talks about “…zeroconf, mDNS, or DNS-SD advertisements”?
Basically an unauthenticated perl interpreter with root open to the network by default in most configurations across a couple decades.
It’s about as bad as it can be?
So it depends. For example some legacy apple stuff had a bad DHCP implementation where it would try to hold onto an IP address it had before.
When there’s one DHCP server with a reserved ip it won’t assign that ip to the wrong device. (Unless you’re running some buggy software that takes your configuration as suggestions)
Where the advice to set it anyways comes from scenarios where that DHCP server goes down for long enough that everyone starts self assigning addresses. It’s a real hassle to find the correct system when that happens.
Now that patch 7 has landed has your experience improved?
But I do have the option to create a separate non-mesh network from the AP
Channel 165 tends to be empty if you do try that.
If your core problem is bg3 itself crashing then I’ve gone on a silly tangent here.
You might find act 3 is more stable in dx11 mode assuming proton is up for the challenge.
Another thought of mine is that wireless devices can perform poorly if they are too close to the AP. (Like less than a meter)
I don’t get the option for channel 106
Assuming you’re not in a country that blocks the use of those channels. There is a bunch of corner cutting gear out there that won’t let you use a big chunk of the 5ghz spectrum.
If you’re shopping for new stuff look for gear that supports DFS channels in the future.
…and two AmpliFi mesh access points to provide the wifi.
Mesh networks can perform poorly for applications that are sensitive to latency and jitter. (Such as steam’s remote play)
a whole bunch of hidden networks come with it. I think this must be related to the mesh network, it’s a lot of networks though! 8 or 9 of them
It’s possible that some of those are related. My assumption is that there’s interference from your own devices and the neighbours. But a mesh network isn’t an ideal environment.
In the app, what does the width of the bar represent? It says something like Wifi_Network 157 (155) and has a big flat top that seems to cover a range.
This is indicative of the channel width. It’s a common occurrence to have a network use overlapping channels to increase performance.
The take away is that not all channels are isolated from one another and it’s possible for a network to have many of them bonded together.
With Wifi_Network 157 (155). It’s indicating that the network’s real channel 155 with a 80mhz channel width. But it’s configured to channel 157 for its beacon as not all devices will connect in 80mhz mode. 157 represents the 20mhz channel it’s configured to camp on.
Is that indicating that nearby channels can interfere with each other?
Yes.
Channel chart source: https://readus247.com/best-5ghz-channel/
So there’s a few issues at play.
That automatic channel changing feature is more harmful than helpful in this context.
If you’re able to lock it onto an entirely empty channel it’ll help. Try for channel 106
Do you see any overlap on yours in the graph view?
If I recall correctly the framework laptops have a bunch of USBC ports?
If so you could just get a USBC dongle for it.
In the meantime we can evaluate the quality of your WiFi. If you have an android phone, I find this app works fairly well for visualizing the network.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vrem.wifianalyzer
Additionally, If you have a dual band router I would suggest disabling the 2.4Ghz band unless you have any legacy devices that use it.
Check that your network isn’t overlapping with any other networks.
Are you able to connect everything involved via ethernet?
Wi-Fi can be unreliable for many reasons so being near it isn’t going to change the thought much.
A quick google suggests to me that it’s Vulkan if you are running it that way but I can’t confirm.
What may be happening is that when the connection is unstable it may not be well designed enough to handle the dropped connection gracefully to let you reconnect.
I noticed a pretty extreme difference in performance in openssh when using x11 forwarding when I touch the cipher suite.
AES128-ctr vs AES128-gcm on kubuntu 22.04.
I was wondering if anyone could shed some light into that. I’m mostly curious if it’s not using hardware acceleration when I switch it to GCM.
Are you trying to do this over ethernet or WiFi?
If you’re trying to use wifi that connection needs to be stellar for this to work well. No over-lapping channels with the neighbours and not too many clients.
If you’re experiencing this on a wired connection, look into if your gear supports jumbo frames and confirm it’s a gigabit link.
Try using Vulkan mode for BG3.
Avoiding spam filters and ISP blocks are a common issue with self hosted email.
Ideally you’ll have a mature domain, dkim configured and an IP that’s not blacklisted on a network that allows email traffic.
OVH offers pretty cheap email hosting if you just want a turn key solution.
Otherwise if you want your home lab to work this way you may need to configure something akin to a forward proxy on a VPS to act as a gateway for your homelab.
This could be achieved using wireguard and iptables. By routing the email traffic to your homelab.
Has anyone seen the anti AI art where people draw 3d shapes in faint lines over the real art.
I can’t find a good example of it
There’s a concept in this industry where you eat your own dog food.
Deploying these updates to your own people could have avoided this mess.
I’d suggest using OVH. https://help.ovhcloud.com/csm/en-ie-dns-dynhost?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0051641
Depending on your country you may need to use ovh canada
Syncthing like others suggested is probably the way to go.
But if you want more options you can do a lot with WebDAV. https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-webdav-access-with-apache-on-ubuntu-18-04
In the days of DOS you would run ‘win’ to open windows assuming it was installed and not in your autoexec
So I’ve been the person who denies projects like these in the office.
There are two non-negotiable requirements for equipment like this.
It absolutely must not in any way interact with outside servers or remote services. All data must stay contained within the company.
The software must be open for inspection with a locally reproducible build. Or accredited by a trustworthy provider such as Microsoft.
Failure to meet those requirements and the proposal is dead.
Surprise surprise when your IT budget is perpetually anemic.