That’s not what neglect is

A: all models are trained on something

2, you’re building your own straw man here. You’ve set up an extremely narrow condition under which this particular type of pedophilia is acceptable. Prove to me that that’s the norm, that it’s a typical use scenario, and that people looking at that crap are exclusively looking at loli, and not images meant to look like real people, and there’s a debate to be had there. But if you think any of that is true you’re lying to yourself. Sexualization of others is not going to happen in a vacuum under sterile conditions, it’s going to bleed in to real life.

The act of baking does indeed make you a baker. Definitionally.

Just because you aren’t going pro doesn’t mean you aren’t making a cake.

The only people that sexualize children are pedophiles.

Shout out to Physics Girl Dianna. Who is still bedridden.

The pencil does not make the art.

There’s a fundamental difference between AI image generation and an artist creating something that is both inherent and obvious.

If you can’t see that then I’m not sure there’s much help for you.

More than that, art being created by an artist has a style and a feeling behind it. There’s a nostalgia present in every painting. An artist saw something, and recreated it in a way that spoke to them.

An algorithm can recreate images that look similar but with no understanding. It’s just an image and lacks all the things that makes art what it is. By removing humanity from art you literally remove the reason for it to exist.

Flatly, it isn’t art. It’s slightly better than random. But as it happens, humans are better at that too.

He didn’t make shit.

A computer made it. He provided some guidance.

Years ago I left a shitty call center job and left a scathing review on glassdoor. About a year later I started getting hammered with requests for clarification or to remove the review entirely. I ignored them all, and never bothered to look back. It’s still up, but the company I worked for sold itself to some other shitty overlord that also had terrible employer reviews.

HEYYYY MACARENA

Guys it’s literally in the completely free to download book linked in this post, called exactly what it’s called here.

A few years ago my ISP pushed an update to my router that changed the password requirements, invalidating my passwords. Because I couldn’t enter the old password I also couldn’t change the password. I had to do a factory reset.

Hosers.

Be the radical leftist they’re afraid you are

Dank jenk bank memes bro.

He knows he’s a hypocrite, he doesn’t care. Whatever it takes to advance. That’s how he went from law school flunkie to VP candidate.

He’s also a dog chasing cars, he only knows how to suck ass, he doesn’t actually know what to do when he gets what he wants

I was watching a film set in the Midwest and they’re driving between two rural towns but the corn they’re driving by in one scene is Marty’s long ear sweet corn, and then like two lines later they’re driving by Nor’Eastern Hard Grain. Completely pulled me out of the movie those two fields would be miles apart!

.82 Yao Mings

“you’re telling me ALL of the wiring for the most important fingers goes through one tiny, fragile hole?”

Probably more so cheaper to mold the plastic case with weak threads than any other function.

Machinist guy here!

Threads fail. Threads are generally the most likely thing to fail in any given mechanism. Generally, when the threads are expected to do more work than just sit there and not move, as in fastening a hinge for example, we try to make sure the threads are all the same kind of material.

I would never expect plastic threads to hold up to repeated use with an iron bolt inside. Something is going to give up, and it’s going to be the soft plastic threads, every single time.

Think about cheap as fuck IKEA furniture, any time they have a bolt to screw in, you install an insert first. We do the same thing in plastic, aluminum, shit even steel sometimes if we want the bolt to fail first.