Its not truely open source if its non commercial
Its not truely open source if its non commercial
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike is not really open source. It’s more like source available
I learned recently coal is not renewable at all. We will never get more coal. Coal exists from a period of time when trees had cellulose but bacteria had no means of breaking down cellulose.
I meant all bitcoins are useless
“Note that, of the three layers above, only the UI layer is closed-source. Roughly 92% of the browser’s code is open source coming from Chromium, 3% is open source coming from us, which leaves only 5% for our UI closed-source code.”
Straight from the horses mouth. So 92% of it is the same as every other chromium browser. 3% is their oss code and 5% is closed source. That 5% more than actual open source browsers.
Which means the final product is closed source.
No bitcoin is useless, but using it doesn’t cause water waste
Holy shit as a socialist this is the most grounded and respectable take I have ever seen.
Free software is very much like communism, the difference is that cloning something costs nothing, imagine if we could use a ray gun to clone any object, then communism would no longer be even remotely idealistic.