El Barto

Amen, brother!

That is correct.

Since the dawn of the internet it is known that “I agree!” comments don’t add anything to the discussion. If you don’t want to learn something new, then, as your teacher, I can’t do much, son.

Writing just “this” adds nothing to the discussion.

I’m a graybeard software engineer with 30+ years of experience.

I appreciated your explanation.

I’m not lightening the mood; I’m just stating a fact. Some cells billions of years ago started producing this very highly toxic, very highly poisonous gas that killed 99% of everything that was living back then on Earth. That gas spread everywhere. It was horrible. Death everywhere. Did the world end? Nope. New life adapted and thrived. The gas was oxygen.

Now it seems like it will be CO2. Produced by carbon-based organisms, like those oxygen-producing assholes of a distant past. And I, just like the universe, say, “eh… it happens.”

But more to the point - naaaaah, the world will be fine. Humans ain’t going nowhere. We’re what, 8 billion already? That’s 8 million of millions of people. Some of us will just move underground, or to the poles. But chances are, we’ll fix this issue before it becomes a human extinction event.

Of human-habitable world, you mean.

Imagine if the dinosaurs had newspapers back then: “THE WORLD IS ENDING!!” And mammals be like “lol”

The downvoters don’t realize that science is all about finding out about stuff. The whys, the hows… you know, what “woke” people do.

No, they wouldn’t. What does “best” mean in this context, anyway?

Did you… read the article?

Ditto. Thanks!

A looser fit than other here but still a great headline. Reflects the state of corporatism IMO.

Actually, this doesn’t fit here at all!

You too!

I don’t think we’re disagreeing.

I don’t think you’re disagreeing with the parent poster…

The same thing happened with a lot of awesome things you’re using right now. But I understand your impatience.

Ok! Will do.

Couldn’t an AI do the same?

And disclaimer, I’m not a fan of the current iteration of “AIs.” I’m just trying to understand why coding and testing would be an issue if done by some tool.

Hm, but isn’t usually the same developer who writes the code and the test?

Why would it be an issue if an AI does the same?

Why is this garbage in a science community?

Where’s the study? The experiments? The research?