• 2 Posts
  • 576 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle








  • Direct from Seagate wouldn’t be bad, check their store first to see if you can cut out Amazon.

    I was talking about random reseller stores. “Manufacturer refurbished” for things you can’t see is almost always a good idea. The manufacturer has their brand name on the line and usually go over common fail points and replace if it looks worn.

    Stores/Amazon doing “renewed” means they tried to cover up superficial damage and is completely different. It might look ok on the outside and be complete junk on the inside.

    Think of “renewed” as “open box returns” except it might have taken the last user 5 years to return. It’s a much worse gamble.


  • Depends.

    If it’s “buy from Amazon” then you can return it with no issue if shits bad.

    If Amazon is just the middleman, than the seller could be scamming and will either fight returns or just close up shop. I wouldn’t buy any used electronic over $200 from a middle man because of that, so this is kind of on the line.

    But modern HDDs hold up a lot better than they used to. I tend to “ship of Theseus” PC builds and I’ve got some HDDs probably 15 years old that are still going strong.

    I can’t remember the last time I’ve heard anyone say a HDD failed. Just people remembering what it was like 25 years ago. We don’t think of innovation with old tech like HDDs, but there’s been a lot of improvements to the parts that used to fail regularly.

    Exos x18 are enterprise drives that came out last than 5 years ago, I can’t imagine they were replaced because they’re all bad, just companies upgrading to newer tech. So should be fine and last you well over a decade.



  • Another idiot who thinks “prompt engineering” is a real skill and not just another step those companies are using idiots for free AI training.

    You ask AI to draw a ninja turtle on a skateboard, and that “effort” they put into phrasing their request well enough for the AI to understand makes the AI learn the 10 past attempts were looking for what the 11th got

    And now it won’t take ten tries to go that route

    Any “skill” by the user has a very short expiration date because the next version won’t need it thanks to all the time users spent developing those “skills”.

    But no one impressed with AI is smart enough to realize that. And since they’re the on s training the AI…

    Idiots in, idiots out








  • Really good study, but it looks like the only things with a stronger correlation than attention control score and resting pupil size was caffeine and nicotine.

    And it’s concerning so many participants couldn’t verify nicotine/caffeine consumption when those are the biggest connections when they disclose their sample was “moderate”.

    We’d also have to get into how nicotine/caffeine would be “performance enhancing” for these kinds of tests, yet would make the pupils contract. They should have tossed the participants who couldn’t report nicotine/caffeine instead of including them.

    But ideally it would have just been participants who had abstained from either for 24 hours. Good luck with that tho.


  • Yeah, it just seems like its measuring engagement during the testing.

    Would have been better to take measurements at “rest” as well, then compare them.

    It’d be a lot easier to believe there’s a larger increase in pupil size when concentrating than permenantly.

    That being said both my parents had blue eyes, and looking at my DNA I should have blue eyes. But they’re green, which can be explained by pupil dilation causing an increase in pigment density. Like how David Bowie has one eye that’s permanently dilated so looking at a picture it looks like he has heterochromia when he doesnt.

    https://slate.com/culture/2016/01/the-story-behind-david-bowie-s-unusual-eyes.html

    Shits interesting, but there’s going to need to be a lot of follow up studies to rule out confounding variables.


  • Interesting, but I think it has more to do with focus and/or adrenal response…

    That being said, I’ve taken the Wechsler IQ test, and scored higher than can be measured reliably.

    I’m super light sensitive, had some optometrists refuse contact prescriptions because my pupils “dilated too much”, and had to pay like a $200 licensing fee when I got LASIK because they had to use some special attachment because it had to be done wide than normal Lasik due to pupil size.

    So maybe there is something to this? I still think there’s a middle step in there and not direct correlation though