• 2 Posts
  • 563 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle






  • Really good study, but it looks like the only things with a stronger correlation than attention control score and resting pupil size was caffeine and nicotine.

    And it’s concerning so many participants couldn’t verify nicotine/caffeine consumption when those are the biggest connections when they disclose their sample was “moderate”.

    We’d also have to get into how nicotine/caffeine would be “performance enhancing” for these kinds of tests, yet would make the pupils contract. They should have tossed the participants who couldn’t report nicotine/caffeine instead of including them.

    But ideally it would have just been participants who had abstained from either for 24 hours. Good luck with that tho.


  • Yeah, it just seems like its measuring engagement during the testing.

    Would have been better to take measurements at “rest” as well, then compare them.

    It’d be a lot easier to believe there’s a larger increase in pupil size when concentrating than permenantly.

    That being said both my parents had blue eyes, and looking at my DNA I should have blue eyes. But they’re green, which can be explained by pupil dilation causing an increase in pigment density. Like how David Bowie has one eye that’s permanently dilated so looking at a picture it looks like he has heterochromia when he doesnt.

    https://slate.com/culture/2016/01/the-story-behind-david-bowie-s-unusual-eyes.html

    Shits interesting, but there’s going to need to be a lot of follow up studies to rule out confounding variables.


  • Interesting, but I think it has more to do with focus and/or adrenal response…

    That being said, I’ve taken the Wechsler IQ test, and scored higher than can be measured reliably.

    I’m super light sensitive, had some optometrists refuse contact prescriptions because my pupils “dilated too much”, and had to pay like a $200 licensing fee when I got LASIK because they had to use some special attachment because it had to be done wide than normal Lasik due to pupil size.

    So maybe there is something to this? I still think there’s a middle step in there and not direct correlation though


  • What’s really freaky is one of the theories we can’t see other life, is to our perspective (due to expansion of the universe) their rate of expansion is faster than the speed of light, and we won’t know till they’re pretty much at our doorstep.

    There might be a bunch of them all over, jumping around the universe and claiming everything they see like old school European countries.

    If that happens the best result is they make us a “colony” but honestly a civilization that scale doesn’t need resources or anything. The most likely explanation for that behavior would be just to eliminate any future competition if we advance unchecked.

    Rather than colonize, they might just want to wipe out our planet, which would be practically effortless for a civilization that advanced. If something crashed into Earth at those speeds, the planet itself would be gone, no way for us to survive or even stop it.

    The only defense is to spread out from Earth, which makes the hypothetical advanced space race afraid of our expansion kind of right

    Any civilization in a universe like that needs to constantly expand just to ensure it’s survival. Because the only reason we’d be preserved was if they cared about the novelty of life.

    If they’ve spent millions of years expanding their space, alien life probably isn’t that novel to them anymore. So really, our only bet is we’re entertaining, like a zoo.




  • You have an idea in your head of a standard that is “middle class”.

    That is not what I’m talking about.

    If we’re splitting the classes by median income (assets could be done, but people in the middle class by median are lucky to even have a mortgage on a home) then it’s about 40k for an individual and 75k for a household.

    Statistically speaking “middle class” is the median and a statistical deviation either way.

    But that paints an incredibly depressing and realistic picture of what America’s “economy” is really like. So the wealthy have pushed the narrative you’re following that only a minority of people can obtain “middle class”.

    Historically when shit gets organized like that, it doesn’t end well for the ones that hoarded all the wealth.

    The harsh truth is that “middle class” is pretty fucking broke. It’s just what happens when you concentrate the wealth at one end of the distribution. And literally the only way to fix that, is by moving the wealth to people lower in the distribution.

    So rather than that be the discussion, it benefits the wealthy if people do what you’re doing, and act like it just disappeared and can magically be made to reappear from thin air without taking wealth back from the people who have it now.




  • Middle class is paycheck to paycheck, has been for a while.

    I’m lucky enough I can stack retirement and I got a house when it was (comparatively cheap).

    If we’re splitting the classes by median income (assets could be done, but people in the middle class by median are lucky to even have a mortgage on a home) then it’s about 40k for an individual and 75k for a household. And I’m solidly “upper class” even though I’ll never amass more than a million in assets unless real estate inflation jumps past Ludacris and into plaid.

    The fact that anyone with a million in assets, let alone cash/stocks would consider themselves “middle class” just tells you stupid people can luck out and become millionaires.

    It’s a level of delusion that is actual impressive.

    So the “middle class” that’s a single income, house in the burbs, two cars, vacations every year…

    That shits gone. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t still a statistical middle class.