I prefer this Ubuntu

I think the largest challenge though is maintaining the distribution and managing the associated upfront costs.

Existing large content producers could likely afford to handle this but new producers could struggle paying to seed their content.

Though I do think overall this is more achievable than people give it credit for:

• YT videos don’t need huge bandwidth for a sustained period; only for short bursts. Most views come in within a week.
• Content is probably localized to specific countries. Less need to replicate across the globe.
• Let the source prefer to seed the highest quality and other peers downsample and replicate as needed.
• Doesn’t need YT scale. Tons of YT “content” is spammers leeching essentially free hosting from YT. No one needs to seed their videos if they don’t want to.
• 1080p is still fine for YT videos. h265 is very efficient (though downsampling 265 isn’t great). Don’t need 4k for most videos.

Just adding to the chorus that while it’s cool and conveniently sized the screen just falls apart.

lol sure loser whatever

The fuck is with these stupid bots that try to turn every conversation into “muh immigration”

Yeah. Society is responsible for the outcomes of its children. It shouldn’t personally hurt your feelings but it should motivate your actions.

Hrmm. TIL. Thanks!

This fuckin quote is from Joseph Goebbels and was about one of his views on a Jewish conspiracy. I so hate this quote.

He got them a few and far far less than they asked for.

And yet I can use many clients that don’t require this. So it is rmayayo even if indirectly.

We do. We just don’t like you two very much.

Yeah, park and ride, bike and ride, complete public transit, or even driving on less crowded highways to cities with more available parking because other people chose other modes.

Ultimately how anyone would commute depends on their own personal factors and what’s available. In the future we’ll have more multimodal transport and that should make things nicer for everyone.

You should look it up for yourself if you don’t think subjective experiences can be defined and measured in an objective and falsifiable way.

You could, for example, conduct a falsifiable experiment related to people’s perception of color or heat or their night vision.

You truly have no idea what you’re talking about with regards to science, hypotheses, and how they work.

There are falsifiable hypotheses in this study.

Here’s the study. Go get access to the full text and read it https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2808129

Taking swift actions to oppose neo-nazis being able to spread their ideology is not running from them. Quite the opposite. Anyways it’s banned now so this is all moot.