If you need offline version of the sites you can save them with SingleFileZ
If you need offline version of the sites you can save them with SingleFileZ
because today’s computer are so incredibly weak they can’t handle a few megabytes of text anymore.
I mean, sites today are more richer compared to earlier 2000s. We have css, more complex js scripts, embedded fonts, embedded videos etc. I’m sure you understand that it takes more than a few megabytes of RAM.
Sorry about that, the headline was caught my attention while I was surfing… You should ignore the crypto / nft thing
Yes, and you can join R10C telegram group
You’ll find many tutorials and custom roms
You may use Nextcloud for personal use, I’ve been using it for 2 years now.
try this url link to sign-up https://nextcloud.com/sign-up/
In the beginning of the video she explains this isn’t for everyone. Throughout the video she discusses tradeoffs. Seems pretty clear she understands the difficulty of this.
Yup, unless you have a problem with authority, or investigative journalists
I can open CNN without any troubles 🤔
We have https://lemm.ee/c/moviesandtv
maybe you could ask them?
I’m not so surprised
It’s time for you start to using LibreWolf (uBlock Origin pre-installed)
There are reasons why you should use Firefox browser or its forks (I use Mull browser) with uBlock Origin.
This article doesn’t give any real context from where these numbers come from
Probably from Bloomberg report
The same police in the US who need military grade APCs for reasons unknowable to the universe?
It was useful in Nakatomi Plaza siege, oh wait…
Remember the Fifth of November
Originally OP was from kerala.party, I think their accounts were banned from kerala.party.
EDIT :
As I thought, there were complaints regarding the OP
How about using dnscrypt-proxy?
You got randomized dns servers and you can use your own blocklists
I have deleted the previous post, but there seems to be a synchronization problem with other instances
As a M$ Windows user for years, I can tell you there’s little to no incentive in Linux development. That’s why M$ Windows is so much better than Linux, they give incentives / rebates to hardware manufacturers if they can sell pre-installed Windows PCs/Laptops. So they are willing to build device drivers to support Windows.
I don’t get it why you have to blame Samba devs? SMB protocol was built by M$. It’s not easy to build something like Samba, at least they need to analyze how the SMB protocol works. If you want a better compatibility for sharing data with SMB you should use M$ Windows.