It would seem this entire discussion stems from your misunderstanding of my initial comment.

I pointed out that there are other industries that have a much greater environmental impact and you got butthurt about it. I wanted to help you understand that other industries (e.g. oil/transport) have a much greater impact, which it looks like I’ve accomplished. I’m glad I could help you see the bigger picture, but you might want to check your own reading comprehension before throwing a tantrum in the future.

Guess what though, that’s what the literature supports.

that claim is beyond the scope of that study, which didn’t actually consider any source of ghg emissions except agriculture.

i didn’t downvote anything.

poore-nemecek 2018 is pretty low-quality. they attribute everything fed to livestock as emissions necessary in rearing livestock, but that’s just not true: much of what is fed to livestock would outherwise be waste, so feeding it to livestock is a conservation of resources, and not a net emission.