• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I was under the impression we were talking about power users though. isnt this thread about how to debloat Windows? I’m talking about specifically people taking their time to learn and debloat Windows. Thats a huge difference.

    Average consumers put up with an OS riddled with ads because they don’t know any better, not because Facebook and Zoom wouldn’t work.

    Even then if you swap it out for Linux, most average people will adapt to the UI and then not see much difference. Average people use apps that are all on Linux one way or the other.

    • brie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I guess it kind of depends. Not really sure what most people actually use, but for those who use MS’s services, Office web isn’t great, and Skype for Linux is rather temperamental. A lot of games work under Proton, but not all.

      My perception of “average user” is probably skewed towards being not technical enough to troubleshoot on their own, but skilled enough to run through a tutorial of what keys to press. For someone used to Windows, patching things up is simpler than learning all the ins and outs of a new OS.

      I don’t disagree that most people would be fine using Linux, but there needs to be a compelling reason why Linux would be significantly better, or else the switching cost makes it not worthwhile.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I wholeheartedly agree with your last point.

        Linux is better for a lot of uses but it has to be much better in order for people to actually want to switch.

        Or it has to come preinstalled on computers. Maybe the cost savings alone would be worth it to people. This happened in the past in my country and you still see many normies who prefer Linux.