Biologically male procedures only. EDIT: If the two people who downvoted this question could explain their reasoning, I would be super interested. No judgements. This is a safe space!

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Do every test available for prevention and prophylaxis.
    Get your general practitioner to do a full health check, ECG, EEG, cardiac ultrasound, a full blood panel, bloodpressure, pulmonary function, skin cancer prevention ect.
    Schedule a gastroscopy and colonoscopy.
    Check in with an urologist to get your prostate and urinary tract checked.
    If you can, get a full body scan. Either PET or MRI.

    Nearly every serious disease or health issue is easier prevented or treated when caught before it casues real issues.
    Every cancer there is, has a better outcome and is easier treated when found early. Most of them are silent until very late in the game.

    This is something I would recommend to anyone: Take advantage of every preventative messure or examination that is available to you!
    There is no illness that you can detect too early.

    • K[r]ukenberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Omfg, don’t get a PET-scan ‘just because’. You would literally have to be injected with radioactive particles. The other stuff, while not necessary, will atleast not kill you faster.

      Last paragraph is also massively oversimplified. Getting a ‘you have cancer’-speech and treatment for a superslow growing prostatecancer will fuck with your mind and body more than the cancer itself. That’s why most health care systems advise against general PSA screening.

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Just to provide some data on the radiation dose. It’s everyone’s own decision whether a ‘willy-nilly’ PET scan is worth it.

        From the English Wikipedia:

        FDG, which is now the standard radiotracer used for PET neuroimaging and cancer patient management, has an effective radiation dose of 14 mSv.

        The amount of radiation in FDG is similar to the effective dose of spending one year in the American city of Denver, Colorado (12.4 mSv/year). […T]he whole body occupational dose limit for nuclear energy workers in the US is 50 mSv/year.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography#Safety

        From the German Wikipedia:

        Es ist bei einer Strahlendosis von 1 Sievert (Sv), der 100 Menschen ausgesetzt sind, mit 5 Todesfällen durch Strahlenkrebs zu rechnen […]. Man müsste also 100.000 PET-Untersuchungen durchführen, um 35 Todesfälle an Strahlenkrebs (nach einer mittleren Latenzzeit von etwa 15 Jahren für Leukämie und etwa 40 Jahren für solide Tumoren) zu verursachen, das heißt etwa eine auf 3000 Untersuchungen

        If 100 people received a radiation dose of 1 Sievert (Sv), one would expect 5 deaths due to radiation-induced cancer […]. One would need 100,000 PET scans in order to cause 35 cancer deaths (after a median wait duration of 15 years for leucemia and 40 years for solid tumors), which is about 1 in 3000 scans.

        https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie#Strahlenexposition

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The kicker is that I just moved here and don’t have a PCP (primary care physician) yet. AND my company is switching health plans next year, so I basically need to find someone who takes BOTH health plans.

  • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    My health insurance denied covering my vasectomy so i put it off. Later that year i was in an accident and hit my max out of pocket pretty quick. I called up my doctor and had them resubmit the preauthorization. got it covered at 100%

    I’m still pretty pissed that sterilization for women is covered at 100% under my plan but not for men. (It should be both 100% imo)

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      It goes the opposite way for wanting to reproduce, too. That is, myself and my wife decided we would try to start a family, and she’s apparently fine, but something isn’t working on my side of things. (Her doc even said “Don’t worry about it, men tend to be an easy fix.”)

      There’s a million programs and special coverages and stuff for women’s fertility, but all I asked is “Hey can we just diagnose what’s wrong with me? I don’t want super-swimmer-syrum or something I just wanna know.”

      They refuse to consider it urology or any kind of “men’s health”, and keep wanting to rule as “fertility treatment” which conveniently isn’t covered.

      Men’s reproductive rights aren’t even on the radar.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    To your “edit” point: Don’t take a handful of downvotes personally; it’s pretty easy to do accidentally on mobile so they may have been unintentional

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      To add to that downvotes have no serious negative effect on this platform

      In reddit as soon as a few people downloaded you, you disappeared

      Here people can brigade you and unless you’re reading top, who cares, your stuff still gets seen.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh I know. I am genuinely curious what anyone found so objectionable. They are welcome to their opinion, I’m just very eager to know what it is.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They skimmed your post, read the words “biologically”, “male” and “only” in that order, and it triggered their this-sounds-transphobic reflex.
          Don’t worry about it.

    • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some people also use downvotes as way to say they dislike something. Unlikely, but some people might be down voting to indicate they don’t like the insurance industry.

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I downvote anyone that whines about or asks why they’re getting downvotes. Otherwise I don’t up/downvote anything at all (except that guy that is posting triangles for upvotes)

      Seriously, who cares?

      • RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Wait, what? You guys are paying all that for insurance and it doesn’t always include dental? Like the main reason I wanted to be on health insurance here in Canada was for dental and prescriptions. I’ve been on some of the crappiest insurance plans here and they all include dental.

        • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          It never counts dental😢. Dental industry is fighting like hell to stay separate. Our dentists want bigger cuts which is why they only cover 50%

        • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Dental and vision are never included in US health insurance and operate on a totally different confusing insurance framework. They’re only available through separate plans and have their own deductables and terms. But unlike health insurance the premiums are generally orders of magnitude lower for both vision and dental.

          The problem I’ve had is that the maximum benefit is typically in the range of $2k-$3k/yr for dental which is quickly hit if you have any oral surgery needs. Unlike with healthcare I don’t feel ripped off when paying for dental/vision since the few hundred dollars per year covers preventative care visits too.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Man I live in a country with socialized healthcare and we don’t get dental either. Or vision.

          There are private insurance providers who offer both. But they ONLY offer services to employers and I’ve never had a company offer such a benefit. Because you don’t need luxury bones to work and any employer who makes you work with a screen is already forced to cover up to some sum every year or every few years (I don’t remember) spent on glasses. And there’s little point in all the other coverage because it’s already free.

          I’m this close to starting my own company so I could offer myself dental…

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do you snore? Get a sleep study and a CPAP - thats pricy! Need a colonoscopy? Gel shots in your knees? Any family histories that would warrant testing for cancer markers?

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re beginning to struggle with joints, get on the PT, MRI route while it’s free.

            • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I’m still in the “ramp up” period, so I’m not getting the full effect yet. I need to get used to having my tongue muscle electrically stimulated, with increasing intensity, forcing me to stick my tongue out. It’s a very odd sensation at first. And it’s been rough going, not gonna lie. But I think with some timing adjustments it will do its thing. I have only heard good things from everyone else who has done it, so I’m honestly not concerned at this point. Also, I am a cyborg now, and I have my own remote control, so that’s freakin’ sweet!

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      +1 for cpap. You might not like it at first but seriously try out different options. There’s different mask types. My wife’s blood pressure dropped to normal very quickly once she started using it. Mood and energy levels improved by a lot. Sleep is super important

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Get your ears cleaned at an ent. Go to a dermatologist and get a facial. Go to a pediatrist and get a mani/pedi.

    Really sucks that dental doesn’t count as medical.

  • bignate31@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    oh. go get a therapist–not physical; mental. they’re insanely expensive, but you can spend the next three months shopping around and by the new year you’ll have found someone you like!

  • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is the perfect opportunity to recreationally infect yourself with rare short term diseases. Try breaking your arm or nose so you have a story. Self harm has never been so cheap.

    Edit: See evasive_chimpanzee’s comment here, as the following seems to be incorrect information

    Seriously though get checked for prostate cancer. Especially if you’re over 25 it’s very possible and catching it early will be a massive difference.

    Same for everyone reading this. I doubt it’s that expensive so please look into it and get checked if affordable where you are.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Checking for prostate cancer is super easy now and doesn’t even require a finger in your bum. It’s a simple blood test that is far more accurate than the traditional manual method. I get one done every time I have a physical since they just add it on to the other stuff they check my blood for.

      • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Huh, I’m always happy to proven wrong. thank you for bringing this up.

        Is this still relevant however with blood testing becoming more prevelant? The main reasons listed are due to harms caused by probing both physical and psychological along with false positives which out-weigh the positives of a 0.128% life saving outcome. It’s been 6, nearly 7 years now and prostate testing is both more accurate and non-invasive

        Either way, this body is currently in the final research plan stage of updating the recommendation.
        https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-update-summary/prostate-cancer-screening-adults
        I’d agree we should stand by the current assessment though until it changes. Thank you for the correction

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are primarily 2 stool tests available today, one has significant false positives, the other doesn’t.

          I forget the names, or I’d send you a link. It’s been about a year since I looked it up. I know my insurance uses the more accurate one, fortunately.

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have no clue, it’s just something I’ve read about a little. It’s definitely not my area of expertise, so take this with a grain of salt.

          From what I understand, prostate cancer is usually very slow, and it’s possible to have a little spot of it for years that doesn’t affect you. For some people, the right answer to finding a prostate tumor is to just monitor it, but obviously, people freak out when they have cancer, and want treatment. Cancer treatments are all no joke, so it seems that you could sacrifice a lot to treat something that would have just chilled there not hurting you.

          I have no clue about the blood tests. If it’s like a “yes or no” for prostate cancer, it might have that same disadvantage. If it tells the Dr something more like type of prostate cancer or growth, it’s a different story.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not sure if your link is the same as I’ve read, but yes, the thing with prostate cancer is that treatment doesn’t seem to change the outcome.

            This is most likely because it usually doesn’t develop until mid-50’s or later, and grows so slowly that it doesn’t have time to kill you.

            I think the concern would be it occurring in younger ages, or it growing faster than typical.

            So test and monitor is likely a good thing, treatment shouldn’t be a given, unless there are clear signs.

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was actually told by my doctor that unless you have a history of colon or prostate cancers in the family, advisory boards are pushing testing to past 40.

      • norimee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Idk. When I worked oncology all our prostate patients were very young men way before 40.

        But thats anecdotal. I don’t have any numbers. But whats the worst thing that can happen when you get a prostate check? That they don’t find anything?

        • Zorcron@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I mean the downsides are basically cost, another stick/blood draw, potential for false positive and further anxiety/testing. No weigh-in on whether or not any individual should at any specific time, but even less-invasive screenings are not zero risk.

          Excerpt from the US Preventative Task Force about prostate cancer screening:

          “An elevated PSA level may be caused by prostate cancer but can also be caused by other conditions, including an enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia) and inflammation of the prostate (prostatitis). Some men without prostate cancer may therefore have positive screening results (ie, “false-positive” results). Men with a positive PSA test result may undergo a transrectal ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of the prostate to diagnose prostate cancer.”

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any minor physical pains? Could see a physical therapist. If you use a computer a lot, your posture might be bad and it helps a lot!

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes here in America we operate healthcare with the knowledge that your teeth and eyes are not a part of your body.

      • folekaule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        For those not in the US: it may be covered, but normally it’s a separate insurance plan and not covered by your regular health insurance.

        It also varies what type of “dental” care. Some mouth/gum surgeries may be covered by the health plan. I think most dental plans cover checkups. All this varies wildly with your employer and insurance election, though.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Clearly it’s not a medical thing. I’d love to find out when that racket started, and who got rich from it.